Examining BIPOC Student Barriers in Undergraduate Research

Conducting Research with Human Participants is presented as an institutional review board (IRB) guide for students and faculty alike. The format is one of a textbook, with learning objectives at the beginning and a chapter summary at the end of each chapter. Chapter summaries are helpful and succinct. They are followed by “Questions to Ask Yourself” that allow readers to reflect on their own previous and current experiences. Finally, “Concepts in Focus for your IRB Work” provides a further distillation of the topics discussed in the chapter.

Collaborative teamwork is fundamental to successful research and is a desirable skill set for employers. Yet students receive little training in how to effectively work in teams. This article presents the preliminary design and implementation of course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) in biology, geology, and environmental engineering in which student teams address questions related to their discipline while contributing to a shared research project. Team science training in communication, research planning, and conflict resolution was embedded into CURE classes at a regional R2 university. Although barriers to this approach were present, evidence in the form of writing prompt scores and team science products suggested student understanding of effective teams and the benefits of working with individuals within and across disciplines to solve complex problems increased.

In this study, the Research Methods Sequence (RMS) courses in the College of Behavioral and Social Sciences at California Baptist University were evaluated. There were two central aims in the study. First, the effectiveness of the RMS courses in developing students’ research skills and perceptions of the research process were assessed. Second, the investigator explored significant factors in the success of research experience in an undergraduate program. It was found that the RMS courses improved students’ proficiency in research-related skills. Students reported gains in thinking and working like a scientist, personal gains related to research work, gains in research skills, and gains in knowledge about and attitude toward research. Furthermore, out-of-course research activities and mentor relationships contributed to the success of the undergraduate research experience.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many undergraduate internships, including the National Science Foundation (NSF) Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) programs, were canceled or moved online. Although several studies have examined student success during the online transition, less research has examined how REU programs have changed from this experience, the ongoing and novel challenges, and strategies that program coordinators employed to overcome them. To investigate this gap, REU site programs were surveyed in the NSF Geosciences (GEO) Directorate, with findings that many students declined participation after having been accepted into programs, and that there were difficulties accessing institutional support services and meeting changing student needs. Despite these challenges, nearly all respondents reported program satisfaction, with several indicating the importance of GEO REU community support. Overall, REU coordinator resilience appears to be a major factor in program success.

This article describes the Research Apprenticeship Program (RAP), a mentored undergraduate research experience implemented in 2017 at a public land-grant institution located in the Appalachian region. The article focuses on RAP’s approach to recruiting, retaining, and supporting students in faculty-mentored research and creative inquiry. To assess the impact of RAP on undergraduate retention, institutional data were collected to identify RAP participants from the years 2017 to 2022 (n = 868) to compare next-year retention rates with institutional averages across similar demographic groups. The results showed that retention rates for RAP participants were significantly higher than institutional averages, and disaggregated data also showed higher retention rates for participants from historically marginalized populations. These results provide evidence of the program’s contribution to the educational development of the Appalachian region.

This study investigates the impact of community college students’ participation in mentored undergraduate research, with an emphasis on STEM transfer students. The STEM Academic Research and Training (START) program at Wake Technical Community College was designed and implemented by community college faculty and staff and was evaluated in a randomized control trial. Early evidence showed statistically significant positive effects on students’ attitudes toward STEM.

ConnectUR is a relatively new annual conference from the Council on Undergraduate Research that brings together all professional constituencies related to undergraduate research. This commentary offers context for the importance, potential impact, and evolutions of ConnectUR as the most inclusive and complete event for leaders in all areas related to undergraduate research.