Texas Tech’s Casadonte Selected as 2021 CUR-Goldwater Scholars Faculty Mentor Awardee

Texas Tech’s Casadonte Selected as 2021 CUR-Goldwater Scholars Faculty Mentor Awardee

Dominick J. Casadonte Jr., Minnie Stevens Piper Professor in the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry at Texas Tech University in Lubbock, has been selected as the 2021 Council on Undergraduate Research-Goldwater Scholars Faculty Mentor Awardee. The award consists of a plaque and $5,000 for the awardee’s research program and/or undergraduate researchers.

Casadonte was honored for his achievements in mentoring nearly 90 undergraduates and 16 high school students in summer research programs. Casadonte, who specializes in inorganic and materials chemistry, earned his BS in chemistry with honors at Case Western Reserve University, and his MS in physical chemistry and PhD in inorganic chemistry at Purdue University. He completed his postdoctoral work at the University of Illinois.

“The Goldwater Foundation is pleased to join with CUR in recognizing exemplary mentors of Goldwater Scholars,” said John Mateja, president of the Goldwater Scholarship Foundation. “Dr. Casadonte’s record of mentoring Goldwater awardees includes seven Scholars and two honorable mentions. In addition, he has assisted 14 students with their scholarship applications and served on Texas Tech’s Goldwater Selection Committee for over 25 years. Most importantly, his work with students changes their lives when he brings them into his laboratory. One of his students said it best when she said that Dr. Casadonte ‘allowed me to uncover my desire to pursue a research career and without his encouragement, I may have never discovered my passion.’”

Said Lindsay Currie, CUR’s executive officer, “Dr. Casadonte exemplifies the finest in undergraduate research mentors in tailoring his approach to individual student needs, promoting independent thought, and nurturing student inquiry and resilience in the face of research setbacks. He not only provides a solid foundation for students as they pursue graduate/professional studies or careers in industry but also inspires his colleagues in their work with students.”

Said Lawrence Schovanec, president of Texas Tech, “Throughout his career, Dom Casadonte has impacted the academic and personal lives of so many students. He’s an exemplary teacher and selfless mentor, and his notable contributions to the success of our students in and out of the classroom can’t be overstated. Dom exemplifies the commitment of Texas Tech University to students, and we are proud of him for receiving this well-deserved recognition.”

Said Casadonte, “It is a real honor to be selected as the 2021 CUR-Goldwater Scholars Faculty Mentor Awardee. The Goldwater Scholars are some of the finest undergraduate researchers in the country. It has been an exceptional privilege to have some of them in my laboratory and to see the beginnings of what I believe are truly remarkable careers in the STEM disciplines. The Council on Undergraduate Research and the Barry Goldwater Scholarship and Excellence in Education Foundation have done an excellent job in promoting young scientists and providing them with opportunities and the tools for the development of their professional lives. I am humbled to have had the chance to be a mentor to some of these outstanding students at this point in their journey.”

Spring 2021 CUR Psychology Division Newsletter

Spring 2021 CUR Psychology Division Newsletter

Click here to download document

Winter 2021 CUR Physics & Astronomy Division Newsletter

Winter 2021 CUR Physics & Astronomy Division Newsletter

Click here to download document

Spring 2021 CUR Education Division Newsletter

Spring 2021 CUR Education Division Newsletter

Click here to download document

CFP, Confronting Failure (a CUR publication)

CFP, Confronting Failure (a CUR publication)

Call for Proposals

Confronting Failure: Approaches to Building Confidence and Resilience in Undergraduate Researchers

Edited by Lisa Corwin (UC Boulder) and Lou Charkourdian (Haverford College)
with Jen Heemstra (Emory University)

The Council on Undergraduate Research open-access publication Confronting Failure: Approaches to Building Confidence and Resilience in Undergraduate Researchers is envisioned as a compilation of approaches to addressing failure during undergraduate research for students, mentors, and administrators. The publication aims to provide encouragement, lessons learned, and effective methods for addressing failure during research for undergraduate research students and mentors that can be applied to individual situations. A range of disciplines and institutional types is expected to be represented, as well as diversity of authors and student populations covered. The editors welcome submissions related to both traditional undergraduate research experiences and course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs).

The editors invite 300-word proposals for case studies that might pertain to one or more of the following areas:

  • Approaches that can assist populations of students that may need additional support such as first-generation students, community college students, and underrepresented students, including those that may include issues of privilege
     
  • Approaches that suggest a negative experience can translate into a positive one (e.g., a failure in one line of inquiry can lead to a new, more productive line of inquiry)
     
  • Approaches that address ways for mentoring through failure for students and mentors
     
  • Approaches that address mental health issues for students and mentors who have experienced failure
     
  • Techniques that can be used in the classroom or research setting to discuss issues of failure and build confidence and resilience in undergraduate researchers
     
  • Approaches that support development of mind-sets and attitudes that proactively prepare students to confront and cope with research failures
     
  • Descriptions of institutional structures or resources that help students navigate research failures


The editors welcome proposals for similar topics that are not specifically listed here.

Submission details. Please submit proposals by May 1, 2021, to SPUR@cur.org. The editors will review the proposals and contact authors by May 28, 2021.Questions? Contact the editors at SPUR@cur.org

Repeating history: Student’s love of history ensures accuracy of theatre productions

Repeating history: Student’s love of history ensures accuracy of theatre productions

When watching a production, a vital source—the dramaturg—is often overlooked. It’s the person who researches the history of the roles and setting, adapts the scripts and consults with everyone involved, so the production is on point. Senior Sachen Pillay is an integral member of Georgia College’s production team.

The double history and liberal studies major and theatre minor did such a thorough job as a dramaturg for his research on his first production, “Ballet Russes,” that he placed first in the Kennedy Center American College Theatre Festival in South Carolina last February. Pillay also entered his research in Georgia College’s Research Symposium last April, which got published. 

“Ballet Russes” is about an enigmatic theatre ballet company that revolutionized the way theatre and ballet were done during the Russian Revolution.

As part of his independent study with Theatre Chair Dr. Karen Berman, Pillay studied the history of the characters and time period for the production. He formulated a 15-page thesis of “Ballet Russes” that argued the research to form its foundation.

Dramaturgs, like Pillay, are used in new play development, when the writers are trying to determine what they’re going to say, the evolution of characters and how they’ll be characterized. They also interpret what the text is trying to relay on an academic or literary level and convey this to the production team.

“We contextualize the history of the play for the artists involved in the project,” Pillay said. “Dramaturgs are there to essentially ask the right questions and get people to think.”

Dramaturgs can also be a confidante for the artists, because often times working in theatre is an emotional process. At times, from the producers to the cast; they become emotionally vested in the production and get lost in their sentiments. So, they need guidance from the dramaturg to regain their focus on the reality of the production.  

“So, we’re the literary manager, historian and therapist. We can be a lot of things at once,” Pillay said. “It just depends on what the situation calls for.”

But it all starts with research. One moment he’s delving into the history and writing, and the other half of his time is spent in the rehearsal space.

“I can actually roll up my sleeves and get to work in the Black Box Theatre,” Pillay said. “I’m watching the actors do their work and conversing with the director about different possibilities. I get to see the art being made.”

After Pillay wrote the thesis for “Ballet Russes,” he made actors’ packets, which entailed researching the biographies of all the actors in the play who are based off of real people. He also located and used archival film from the Russian Revolution period to create a realistic backdrop for the audience. 

“Productions like this one open a dialogue,” he said. “Everyone has a role to play. I think artists especially do, because they express the feelings, wills and emotions of the community in which they live in. And to do my small part in supporting the program that supports those artists is important to me.”

Pillay also shared his love of history in working with Dr. Bob Wilson, professor of history and university historian, in Special Collections transcribing primary sources and placing them into an archivable format for him to use in future chapters of his book on the history of Georgia College. Pillay scanned documents, detailing historical periods and events at the university.

“I learned interesting facts about Georgia College, like the evolution from an all-women’s school to a liberal arts university,” he said. “I made that interesting, historical connection as to how the university was affected by the shift in social demographics that were happening throughout the U.S. at that time. To see this in the college I attend is pretty fascinating.”

Between his time as a dramaturg and transcribing for Wilson, Pillay refined his interdisciplinary skills while at Georgia College.

“I feel that my time at a liberal arts institution really prepared me for something like this,” he said. “You’re bringing in so many different skills—academically and emotionally—into one process. It’s been very interesting.”

Provided by: The Department of Theatre & Dance at Georgia College & State University

Please visit here to read the original article. 

Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research Issue Features Nontraditional Approaches

Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research Issue Features Nontraditional Approaches

The winter 2020 issue of Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research (SPUR), the academic journal of the Council on Undergraduate Research, focuses on unusual approaches to undergraduate research.

Said SPUR Editor-in-Chief James T. LaPlant (Valdosta State University):

We are excited about the winter 2020 issue, which highlights the ever-expanding landscape of undergraduate research initiatives. These include:

  • engaging culinary students in research through a Japanese food and culture focus (by Zhen, Culinary Institute of America)
  • developing an interdisciplinary video game for biology majors (by Sperano et al., MacEwan University)
  • involving underserved rural students in course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs, by Allen et al., Concord University/Virginia Tech), and
  • integrating distance education psychology students into undergraduate research (by Levin and Grewe, Utah State University). 

The vignettes from the running theme on “Undergraduate Research during Times of Disruption” also reveal the impressive innovations underway with undergraduate research during the pandemic, including the revamping of a nanomaterials experiment (by Barstis, Saint Mary’s College) and transitioning a computational research lab to a virtual environment (by Briganti and Brown, Virginia Tech)

Other topics of interest range from organizing and airing a student podcast on sports (by Johannesen, University of Minnesota Crookston) to developing a CURE for first-year students featuring oral histories in a writing course (by McConnell Parsons et al., University of Kentucky)

View the table of contents for the winter 2020 SPUR, or visit the SPUR Volumes and Issues webpage. Questions or comments about the issue may be addressed to SPUR Editor-in-Chief James T. LaPlant or SPUR Technical Editor Elizabeth Foxwell.

About the image: Part of the game interface for Life on the Edge (Sperano et al., winter 2020 SPUR)

Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research publishes scholarly work that examines effective practices and novel approaches, explores pedagogical models, and highlights the results of assessment of undergraduate research. As a peer-reviewed publication of the Council on Undergraduate Research, the journal provides useful and inspiring information that increases understanding of undergraduate student-faculty engagement in research, scholarship, and creative work in all disciplines and at all types of higher education institutions in the United States and abroad. The current Call for Proposals is on “Expanded Directions in Community-Based Undergraduate Research.”

The Council on Undergraduate Research supports faculty development for high-quality undergraduate student-faculty collaborative research and scholarship. More than 700 institutions and more than 13,000 individuals belong to CUR. CUR believes that the best way to capture student interest and create enthusiasm for a discipline is through research in close collaboration with faculty mentors.

Winter 2021 CUR Social Sciences Division Newsletter

Winter 2021 CUR Social Sciences Division Newsletter

Click here to download document

2020 AURA Awardees: Georgia College & State University; Utah State University

2020 AURA Awardees: Georgia College & State University; Utah State University

CUR Honors 2020 Recipients of the Campus-Wide Award for Undergraduate Research Accomplishments

CUR will present its 2020 Campus-Wide Award for Undergraduate Research Accomplishments (AURA) to Georgia College & State University (Milledgeville, GA) and Utah State University (Logan, UT) virtually on April 22, 2021. This award recognizes institutions with exemplary programs that provide high-quality research experiences for undergraduates.

Now in its sixth year, the AURA award draws on CUR’s Characteristics of Excellence in Undergraduate Research (COEUR), which outlines criteria for exceptional undergraduate research, scholarship, and creative activity programs. For AURA recognition, campuses must demonstrate depth and breadth in their undergraduate research initiatives and evidence of continual innovation. Institutions of different Carnegie classifications are considered for the award.

“The 2020 AURA recipients reflect a dedication to wide participation of students and disciplines, curriculum-based experiences, opportunities for student-faculty recognition and publication, and improvements based on data,” said Lindsay Currie, CUR’s executive officer. “Amid the many challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is inspiring to see the steadfast commitment of these higher education institutions to excellence in undergraduate research, scholarship, and creative inquiry on their campuses.”

Georgia College showed impressive growth of its undergraduate research program over a 10-year period. Its integration of undergraduate research with other proven high-impact practices, participation in dialogue on undergraduate research at a national level, application of survey data to improve the program, infusion of undergraduate research into curricula (including a capstone experience), and emphasis on interdisciplinary collaborations that involve many student populations provide a model for other campuses.

“We are grateful for this award as it recognizes the hard work and effort we’ve put into making undergraduate research a priority for our students,” said Steve Dorman, president of Georgia College. “This could not have been done without the dedication of faculty, department chairs, deans, staff, the provost, and others who have worked for many years to establish a strategic way to engage our students in research.”

Hosting one of the oldest undergraduate research programs in the country, Utah State engages large numbers of students and faculty in research across colleges, offers significant opportunities for presentation and publication of undergraduate research (such as biannual research symposia), and builds institutional structures that recognize student and faculty service in undergraduate research, The university’s commitment to assessment offers clear measurement of learning outcomes, and its program shows promise for easy adaptation to varied institutional types.

“Undergraduate research is central to who we are as a land-grant institution,” said Noelle Cockett, president of Utah State University. “Student research and creative inquiry combines the strengths of our three-part mission of learning, discovery, and engagement. We know firsthand the exceptional benefits that come from strengthening ties between our undergraduates and our faculty researchers and having them tackle projects that are important to our state, nation, and the world.”

Improving Online Teams for Undergraduate Research

Improving Online Teams for Undergraduate Research

Keeping undergraduate students engaged and energized in ongoing research teams is an activity made more challenging by the need to meet exclusively online. Dr. Nathaniel Stern, a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee with a dual appointment in Art and Mechanical Engineering, shared his experience working with online teams at a recent gathering of the Wisconsin Council on Undergraduate Research (WisCUR). Afterward, CURAH caught up with Dr. Stern to hear a bit more.

CURAH: What has the move to online teams taught you about what students need?

NS: In brief, there are four things my students need: empathy, energy, structure, and materiality. I provide these things through check-ins, “stokes,” schedules, and visual and material engagement.

I should say also that teams of students need these things regardless of present circumstances, but the need has certainly been amplified by having to meet online.

CURAH: Let’s take these one at a time: tell us about empathy.

NS: In terms of empathy, every meeting begins with a prompted sharing exercise: “The best part of my week was . . .” or “I feel up/down about X” or “I am looking forward to Y.” Sometimes I have them arrange what the empathy check-in will be. I participate, too, and we all respond to each other. In addition, I spend a little extra time with each student on rotation. Here, the goal is to make them feel heard and seen.

CURAH: Now, energy—and what are “stokes”?

NS: Stokes are little things we do to inject energy into our gatherings. We have silent dance parties, play Simon Says, throw invisible knives and balls to each other, set up poses and make drawings on our screens. The main goal here: we want to get out of our seats and get excited about what we are doing. Often, we tie this to where we are in the project, to aesthetics or brainstorming for new ideas, that sort of thing.

CURAH: How do you structure your online teams?

NS: We meet weekly, typically in groups of five. We maintain schedules and timelines, core to-do lists, and assignments using Gantt charts, Google sheets, MURAL with virtual sticky notes, and more. We work on these together, and my one or two most senior students take charge. They use these tools to create investment in the whole project, as well as accountability for individual tasks.

CURAH: Tell us what you mean by materiality.

NS: In my mind, it’s related to the stokes we do for energy. We want to remember we have bodies, that we are bodies, and that we make use of them. But this also means paying attention to visual materials and, well, things. We use MURAL for brainstorming frequently because it mimics a physical whiteboard and post-its. We send materials to each other to play with, we sketch and write during our time together as well as on our own, and we share out. In the fine arts, it should be said, we often confuse medium and discipline, so I make clear to my students that matter really does matter here!

One thing that also helps is that I actually make all of this transparent to my students. I let them in on what I am doing and why. I ask them for feedback on what they need. This mirrors how we make decisions about research direction together, and how we decide who works on what.

CURAH: Can you tell us about one of the projects you’re currently working on with student teams?

NS: I am working, in collaboration with artist and director (and UW-M alum) Samantha Tan, on a Zoom-bound documentary about the Black Lives Matter movement, entitled Leverage: Taking Antiracist Action in This Moment. With the coronavirus pandemic also in the background, the film presents how a variety of community members are working hard towards equity. We do not speak for the movement (or its leaders), but rather with diverse voices who are making Black lives matter. We share what they are both learning and doing, in order to ask us all to take action in this moment, and every moment.

CURAH: As we round into the second year of collaborative work constrained by the global pandemic, any last words?

We still do stokes at every meeting!

Written by: Editorial Team for CUR Arts and Humanities Division

For more information on Dr. Stern’s projects past and present, visit https://nathanielstern.com

Please visit CURAH’s Blog to read the original article.